Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Making Good 3: Virtues, laws and consequentialism

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
Third of three lectures by in the 2011 Annual Uehiro Lecture Series "Making Good: The Challenge of Robustly Demanding Values". Delivered by Philip Pettit, Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and Human Values at Princeton University.
The debate between consequentialism and opposing doctrines turns on whether doing right always means doing good: that is, promoting expected value. How is that debate going to develop once we see that we are required to be virtuous, not just to act virtuously; and to be legally constrained, not just to act legally? Which side in the debate is going to be better able to accommodate the robust demands of virtue-based and law-based values?

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Philip Pettit
Keywords
uehiro
ethics
philosophy
moral
morals
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 24/08/2017
Duration: 01:07:03

Subscribe

Download

Making Good 2: Robust Demands and the Need for Law

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
Second of three lectures by in the 2011 Annual Uehiro Lecture Series "Making Good: The Challenge of Robustly Demanding Values". Delivered by Philip Pettit, Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and Human Values at Princeton University.
The common subjection to law means in any community that we give each other certain legal rights robustly, not just actually or probably. The freedom, respect and dignity that you thereby enjoy come about as a result of how we others are legally constrained; they do not materialize just as a result of what we do, or even, unlike virtue-based goods, as a result of what we are disposed to do. And so law is a distinct way of making good, not just an aid or prompt to doing good; it too creates value in its own right.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Philip Pettit
Keywords
uehiro
ethics
philosophy
moral
morals
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 24/08/2017
Duration: 01:04:03

Subscribe

Download

Making Good 1: Robust Demands and the Need for Virtue

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
First of three lectures in the 2011 Annual Uehiro Lecture Series "Making Good: The Challenge of Robustly Demanding Values". Delivered by Philip Pettit, Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and Human Values at Princeton University.
My loyalty or fidelity or honesty means that I can be relied upon to display a concern for your interests across a range of possible scenarios, not just in actual or probable circumstances. But the good constituted by this robust concern materializes as a result of my virtuous dispositions, not just as a result of what I do. And so virtue is a way of making good, not just an aid to doing good; it creates value in its own right.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Philip Pettit
Keywords
uehiro
ethics
philosophy
moral
morals
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 24/08/2017
Duration: 01:00:21

Subscribe

Download

Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges

Image
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
The annual public Uehiro Lecture Series captures the ethos of the Uehiro Centre, which is to bring the best scholarship in analytic philosophy to bear on the most significant problems of our time, and to make progress in the analysis and resolution of these issues to the highest academic standard, in a manner that is also accessible to the general public. Philosophy should not only create knowledge, it should make people’s lives better.

Subscribe

2015 Welcome & Loebel Lecture in Neuroethics: Death and the self

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
This lecture investigates changing attitudes and beliefs about the persistence of the self.
Many revolutionary positions in philosophy – skepticism, materialism, hard determinism – have disturbing implications. By contrast, the revolutionary idea that there is no persisting self is supposed to have generally beneficial consequences. Insofar as the self does not persist, one should be more generous to others, less punitive, and have less fear of death. This talk will report recent experiments indicating that changing beliefs about the persistence of self does affect generosity and punitiveness. For attitudes about the self and death, we examined responses from Hindus, Tibetan Buddhists and Westerners; the results are complex and surprising.

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Shaun Nichols
Keywords
death
persisting self
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 00:45:39

Subscribe

Download

2015 Loebel Lecture 1: Neurobiological materialism collides with the experience of being human

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
The first of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure
The 2015 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy were delivered by Professor Steven E. Hyman, director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard as well as Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology.

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Steven Hyman
Keywords
philosophy
psychiatry
neurobiology
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 00:52:10

Subscribe

Download

2015 Loebel Lecture 2: Science is quietly, inexorably eroding many core assumptions underlying psychiatry

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
The second of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure
The 2015 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy were delivered by Professor Steven E. Hyman, director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard as well as Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology.

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Steven Hyman
Keywords
philosophy
psychiatry
neurobiology
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 01:01:37

Subscribe

Download

2015 Loebel Lecture 3: What is the upshot?

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
The last of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure
The 2015 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy were delivered by Professor Steven E. Hyman, director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard as well as Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology.

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Steven Hyman
Keywords
philosophy
psychiatry
neurobiology
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 00:59:26

Subscribe

Download

2016 Loebel Lecture 1: Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
Professor Essi Viding delivers the first of two talks in the 2016 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy series
In these Loebel lectures Prof Essi Viding will use disruptive behaviour disorders as an illustrative example to introduce the challenges we face when we try to understand development of psychopathological outcomes. We classify disorders at the level of behaviour, yet individuals arrive at the same behavioural outcomes via multiple different developmental trajectories; a phenomenon called equifinality in the developmental psychopathology literature. A related concept is heterogeneity; we can find individuals with markedly different aetiology to their disorder within the same diagnostic category. The current diagnostic categories identify clinically disturbed functioning, but they do not identify a homogeneous group of individuals. Getting better at individuating distinct pathways to a disordered outcome is only part of the challenge. Once risk factors for a specific developmental trajectory are identified, we still need to understand their modus operandi. There is no doubt that both biology and the social environment play a role in the emergence of psychopathology, but meaningfully studying their interplay is far from trivial. What are the key biological indicators of vulnerability and resilience? How can we isolate causal mechanisms? How do we model multiple social risk factors and their impact over development?

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Essi Viding
Keywords
philosophy
psychiatry
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 00:49:32

Subscribe

Download

2016 Loebel Lecture 2: Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
Embed
Professor Essi Viding delivers the second of two talks in the 2016 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy series
In these Loebel lectures Prof Essi Viding will use disruptive behaviour disorders as an illustrative example to introduce the challenges we face when we try to understand development of psychopathological outcomes. We classify disorders at the level of behaviour, yet individuals arrive at the same behavioural outcomes via multiple different developmental trajectories; a phenomenon called equifinality in the developmental psychopathology literature. A related concept is heterogeneity; we can find individuals with markedly different aetiology to their disorder within the same diagnostic category. The current diagnostic categories identify clinically disturbed functioning, but they do not identify a homogeneous group of individuals. Getting better at individuating distinct pathways to a disordered outcome is only part of the challenge. Once risk factors for a specific developmental trajectory are identified, we still need to understand their modus operandi. There is no doubt that both biology and the social environment play a role in the emergence of psychopathology, but meaningfully studying their interplay is far from trivial. What are the key biological indicators of vulnerability and resilience? How can we isolate causal mechanisms? How do we model multiple social risk factors and their impact over development?

Episode Information

Series
Philosophical perspectives on the causes of mental illness
People
Essi Viding
Keywords
philosophy
psychiatry
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 23/08/2017
Duration: 00:36:17

Subscribe

Download

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 1835
  • Page 1836
  • Page 1837
  • Page 1838
  • Page 1839
  • Page 1840
  • Page 1841
  • Page 1842
  • Page 1843
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' X Account @oxfordpodcasts | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2026 The University of Oxford