Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

What Use Is the Concept of Evil to Us?

Series
From Conscience to Robots: Practical Ethics Workshops
Embed
Paper delivered at the Moral Evil in Practical Ethics Conference, Oxford 2012.
This paper aims to investigate and connect aspects of two questions that may be raised about the idea of evil: firstly, the extent to which we can allay doubts about the legitimacy of the concept of evil; and secondly, the role played in our understanding of evil by the phenomenology - that is, by the nature of our distinctive response to evil-doing. Objections to attributions of evil may be moral, or metaphysical, or both; and they often lead to doubts about the legitimacy of the concept. Such doubts can take the form of (a) denying that anything falls under the concept; or (b) accepting that some cases do fall under the concept but claiming that they can be reduced to cases of less morally or metaphysically troubling forms of wrongdoing; or (c) claiming that the concept is itself an incoherent one. There are various ways of trying to establish whether a concept is legitimate: I canvass several of them, and focus on the investigation of what work the concept of evil does for us. I propose that the work in question is to capture a phenomenological distinction: the concept of evil marks off a discrete class of wrongful actions, namely those which produce in us a phenomenologically distinctive response of moral horror, rather than, say, the more ordinary disapproval (or fear or disgust) which other kinds of wrongful acts typically elicit. This focus on the phenomenology enables us to answer some of the doubts about evil mentioned above; but it does not, so it is argued, introduce an unwanted subjectivity into our attributions of evil. The paper concludes by considering what implications this view might have for a range of issues, such as the question of whether there is a qualitative or a quantitative difference between evil and other kinds of wrongdoing; the extent to which we can be mistaken in our attributions of evil; the relation between evil-doing and forgiveness; the attribution of evil to psychopathic actions; and our understanding of our own capacities for evil.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
From Conscience to Robots: Practical Ethics Workshops
People
Eve Garrard
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 01/02/2012
Duration: 01:12:11

Subscribe

Download

The Limits of Science

Series
The Romanes Lecture
Embed
Lord Rees of Ludlow delivers the 2011 Romanes Lecture.
Telescopes reveal the remote universe; accelerators probe the subatomic world. Thanks to such instruments, astronomers have established, in outline, how our cosmos has evolved from a still-mysterious beginning more than 13 billion years. Billions more years - and perhaps even an infinite time - lie ahead of it. But 99 percent of scientists focus neither on the very small nor the very large, but on the even greater complexities of our everyday world. Materials science, biology and the environmental sciences proceed apace, revealing remarkable insights, and opening up an ever-widening range of applications - both opportunities and threats. We live on an ever more interconnected and crowded planet, where each person is empowered by transformative technology but is making increasing demands on the world's resources. There is a widening gulf between what science enables us to do, and what it's prudent or ethical actually to do. The Earth has existed for 45 million centuries but this is the first when one species, ours, can determine the long-range planetary future. The stakes are high; optimum policies require a longer-term and less parochial perspective than normally prevails in political debate, the deployment of the best scientific advice, and engagement of a wider public. In science itself, the most dramatic conceptual advances are the least predictable. But, in scanning these intellectual horizons, we must be mindful that there may be fundamental limits to our understanding - concepts about key aspects of reality that human brains (even computer-aided) can't grasp. Lord (Martin) Rees was the President of the Royal Society from December 2005 to December 2010. He is Master of Trinity College and Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge. He is also Visiting Professor at Leicester University and Imperial College London. He was appointed Astronomer Royal in 1995, and was nominated to the House of Lords in 2005 as a cross-bench peer. He was appointed a member of the Order of Merit in 2007.

Episode Information

Series
The Romanes Lecture
People
Martin Rees
Keywords
science
arts
humanities
Department: Oxford University Development Office
Date Added: 31/01/2012
Duration: 00:54:14

Subscribe

Download

God and the Heart's Desire

Series
Oriel College Chapel Services
Embed
Sermon which discusses the superficiality of the new atheism. Delivered on 29th Jan 2012 in Oriel College Chapel, by The Revd Professor Alister McGrath, Chair in Theology, Ministry and Education, King's College, London.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Oriel College Chapel Services
People
Alister McGrath
Keywords
anglican
new atheism
sermon
chapel
Department: Oriel College
Date Added: 30/01/2012
Duration: 00:10:35

Subscribe

Download

Modeling individual-level heterogeneity in racial residential segregation

Series
Department of Sociology Podcasts
Embed
Yu Xie (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) explains how racial residential segregation works and how it is best modelled sociologically.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Department of Sociology Podcasts
People
Yu Xie
Keywords
multi-level modelling
quantitative
residential segregation
Department: Department of Sociology
Date Added: 30/01/2012
Duration: 00:40:47

Subscribe

Download

Jimmy Wales on Global free speech in the internet age

Series
Free Speech Debate
Embed
Professor Timothy Garton Ash (Director of Free Speech Debate) interviews Jimmy Wales (Founder of Wikipedia) on the topic of global free speech and the internet. This was the launch event of Free Speech Debate and took place in Oxford on 19 Jan 2012.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Free Speech Debate
People
Jimmy Wales
Timothy Garton Ash
Keywords
wiki
information
freespeechdebate
freedom
discussion
internet
wikipedia
free
speech
community
online
images
politics
debate
Department: St Antony's College
Date Added: 27/01/2012
Duration: 00:56:53

Subscribe

Download

Timothy Garton Ash on Free Speech Debate

Series
Free Speech Debate
Embed
In this short introductory video, the director of Free Speech Debate, talks about the objectives of this Oxford University research project.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Free Speech Debate
People
Timothy Garton Ash
Keywords
st antony's
freedom
st antonys
free
speech
oxford
politics
expression
debate
Department: St Antony's College
Date Added: 27/01/2012
Duration: 00:05:11

Subscribe

Download

Free Speech Debate

Image
Free Speech Debate
Free Speech Debate (http://freespeechdebate.com/) is a global, multilingual website for the discussion of free speech in the age of mass migration and the internet. Ten draft principles for global free speech are laid out, together with explanations and case studies - all for debate. Prominent figures from diverse cultures, faiths and political tendencies are interviewed and asked to comment through video, audio and text. Individual users from across the world are strongly encouraged to take part in the online discussion. They can propose new case studies and suggest revised or entirely new principles.

The project is programmatically dedicated to taking the free speech debate beyond the west and global north, into the east and south. The entire editorial content is carefully translated into 13 languages, covering more than 80% of the world's internet users, by native-speakers of those languages (mainly graduate students at Oxford University). Anyone can then contribute to the online discussion in these or any other widely used languages, and there is a facility to give a rough translation of every user-generated comment into most languages using machine translation.

The website is actively moderated by, and the original content generated by, an international team at Oxford University, working under the leadership of Timothy Garton Ash. Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College.

Subscribe

The August 2011 Riots: A Political Act

Series
Oxford Symposium On The August 2011 Riots: Context And Responses
Embed
Dr Kathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou (Politics Department, Oxford) gives a talk for the Oxford Symposium on the August 2011 Riots.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Oxford Symposium On The August 2011 Riots: Context And Responses
People
Kathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou
Keywords
youth
civil disorder
riots
young people
politics
education
ethnicity
Department: Oxford University Centre for the Environment
Date Added: 27/01/2012
Duration: 00:16:25

Subscribe

Download

Ending Wars in a Wilsonian World: Sovereignty at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919

Series
Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict
Embed
Professor Leonard Smith (Oberlin) gives a talk for the ELAC/CCW Seminar Series on 24 Jan 2012.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict
People
Leonard Smith
Keywords
wilson
peace
humanitarianism
politics
ethics
law
war
armed conflict
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 26/01/2012
Duration: 00:42:24

Subscribe

Download

Richard III

Series
Approaching Shakespeare
Embed
In this thirteenth lecture in the Approaching Shakespeare series the focus is on the inevitability of the ending of Richard III: does the play endorse Richmond's final victory?
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Approaching Shakespeare
People
Emma Smith
Keywords
criticism
play
literature
theatre
language
shakespeare
english
#greatwriters
Department: Faculty of English Language and Literature
Date Added: 25/01/2012
Duration: 00:45:09

Subscribe

Download

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 2548
  • Page 2549
  • Page 2550
  • Page 2551
  • Page 2552
  • Page 2553
  • Page 2554
  • Page 2555
  • Page 2556
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' X Account @oxfordpodcasts | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2026 The University of Oxford