Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

David Nicholls Memorial Annual Lecture, 2017: Professor Andrew Leak, 'New' Governors of the Dew

Series
David Nicholls Memorial Trust
Embed
Professor Andrew Leak, University College London, delivered the 18th David Nicholls Memorial Annual Lecture on 'New' Governors of the Dew at Regent's Park College, Oxford on Monday, 16th October 2017.
Professor Andrew Leak, University College London, delivered the 18th David Nicholls Memorial Annual Lecture on 'New' Governors of the Dew at Regent's Park College, Oxford. His presentation addressed literary and political narratives of rural development, poverty and peasant society in Haiti. Professor Leak further explored the contemporary challenges facing Haitian peasantry from the perspective of Jacques Roumain’s classic novel, Gouverneurs de la rosée (1944), and the Haitian political analyses of David Nicholls.
The David Nicholls Memorial Trust www.dnmt.org.uk was founded in 1997 to commemorate David's life and work following his death in 1996. David Nicholls was a rare phenomenon in today's world of professional pigeon-holing: a polymath and writer of important and influential academic works who never held a mainstream academic post; a theologian whom the Church of England found it difficult to accommodate. The Trust has enabled David's extensive book collection to be kept together in The David Nicholls Memorial Library, which is housed at Regent's Park College, Oxford.
The Trust also funds:
New accessions in Caribbean Studies, so that the Library is kept up-to-date.
Research Awards to enable students to visit Oxford to use the David Nicholls Memorial Library or to complete original research in the Caribbean.
Tche annual David Nicholls Memorial Lecture, held in the second week of October each year, which continues David's focus on providing new and radical perspectives on contemporary issues concerning Caribbean Studies, Political Science and Theology.

Episode Information

Series
David Nicholls Memorial Trust
People
Andrew Leak
Keywords
haiti
development
Department: Kellogg College
Date Added: 08/11/2017
Duration: 00:52:18

Subscribe

Download

Britain, Brexit and the new political chaos

Series
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
Embed
Jack Blanchard, editor, London playbook at Politico, gives a talk as part of the The Business and Practice of Journalism Seminar Series.

Episode Information

Series
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
People
Jack Blanchard
Keywords
politics
Brexit
journalism
reuters
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 08/11/2017
Duration: 00:33:35

Subscribe

Download

Gordon Brown

Series
Prime Ministers and Europe since Thatcher - The Hertford lectures
Embed
Lord Wood of Anfield (Special Adviser to Gordon Brown), gives a talk about Gordon Brown's relationship to Europe as well as his 'muscular intergovernmentalism' approach for resolving issues.

Episode Information

Series
Prime Ministers and Europe since Thatcher - The Hertford lectures
People
Lord Wood of Anfield
Keywords
politics
europe
EU
Brexit
gordon brown
labour
Department: Hertford College
Date Added: 08/11/2017
Duration: 01:12:50

Subscribe

Download

International Law and the Sustainable Development Goals – shaping the rules for our common future

Series
Public International Law Discussion Group (Part II)
Embed
The UN Conference on Sustainable Development - or Rio+20 - took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on 20-22 June 2012
States decided to launch a process to develop a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which built upon the Millennium Development Goals and was designed to converge with the post 2015 development agenda. By 2015, these SDGs had been adopted in the United Nations. In the United Nations General Assembly Resolution Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the UN and its Member States agreed on 17 SDGs and 169 related time-bound targets and specific means of implementation.[1] Relying on joint UNEP/CISDL research, this presentation argues that SDGs and their targets can be found in the object and purpose of many important international treaties in the field of sustainable development.[2] While many SDGs in principle and many targets in concrete terms already form part of international legal obligations of states, the SDGs have been received by legal practitioners as much more than a simple policy document. The SDGs are shaping the application and interpretation of sustainable development as a concept and perhaps interstitial norm, arguably more than even the Rio Declaration Principles. Although designed as a set of country-level goals, the SDGs are already shaping the rules for our common future at the international level.

Bio:

Markus Gehring is the Arthur Watts Senior Research Fellow in Public International Law. His main areas of research are international trade law, international sustainable development law, including climate change and the legal implications of Brexit and EU external relations law. He is also a Senior Fellow with the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), a Fellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow in Law of Hughes Hall and serves as Lead Counsel for the Centre for International Sustainable Development Law (CISDL). Markus started his academic career at the University of Oxford, then joined the University of Cambridge where he served as lecturer in law at the Department of Politics and International Studies, as tutor in Sustainable Development Law and as deputy director in the Centre for European Legal Studies in the Faculty of Law. He has also served as vice-dean of Research and Jean Monnet Research Chair ad personam in Sustainable Development Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section. Markus studied as an Erasmus student at the Universidad de Deusto in Bilbao, Spain. He holds a professional law degree from the Faculty of Law at the University of Hamburg, Germany, an LL.M. from Yale Law School, an M.A. from the University of Cambridge, a Dr. iur. from the Faculty of Law at the University of Hamburg, and a second doctorate with his J.S.D. from Yale Law School. He is a barrister and solicitor of the Law Society of Upper Canada and a Rechtsanwalt (German lawyer) in the Frankfurt/Main Bar in Germany. He is also an affiliate member of Landmark Chambers in London.

Episode Information

Series
Public International Law Discussion Group (Part II)
People
Markus Gehring
Keywords
sustainable development
public international law
member states
SDG
General Assembly
United Nations
Department: Faculty of Law
Date Added: 07/11/2017
Duration: 00:40:03

Subscribe

Download

2015 Uehiro Lectures: Reasons to Worry

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
The second of the three 2015 Annual Uehiro Lectures 'Why Worry About Future Generations'. Why should we care about what happens to human beings in the future, after we ourselves are long gone?
In this lecture I argue that, quite apart from considerations of beneficence, we have reasons of at least four different kinds to try to ensure the survival and flourishing of our successors: reasons of love, reasons of interest, reasons of value, and reasons of reciprocity.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Samuel Scheffler
Keywords
Future generations
beneficence
human continuity
climate change
moral responsibility
population ethics
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 01:01:23

Subscribe

Download

2015 Uehiro Lectures: Conservatism, Temporal Bias, and Future Generations

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
The last of the three 2015 Annual Uehiro Lectures 'Why Worry About Future Generations'. Why should we care about what happens to human beings in the future, after we ourselves are long gone?
The reasons discussed in the previous lecture all depend in one way or another on our existing values and attachments and our conservative disposition to preserve and sustain the things that we value. The idea that our reasons for caring about the fate of future generations depend on an essentially conservative disposition may seem surprising or even paradoxical. In this lecture, I explore this conservative disposition further, explaining why it strongly supports a concern for the survival and flourishing of our successors, and comparing it to the form of conservatism defended by G.A. Cohen. I consider the question whether this kind of conservatism involves a form of irrational temporal bias and how it fits within the context of the more general relations between our attitudes toward time and our attitudes toward value.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Samuel Scheffler
Keywords
Future generations
beneficence
human continuity
climate change
moral responsibility
population ethics
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 01:00:15

Subscribe

Download

2015 Uehiro Lectures: Temporal Parochialism and Its Discontents

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
The first of the three 2015 Annual Uehiro Lectures 'Why Worry About Future Generations'. Why should we care about what happens to human beings in the future, after we ourselves are long gone?
Most of us who live in contemporary liberal societies lack a rich set of evaluative resources for thinking about the human beings who will come after us. We do not possess a highly developed set of ideas about the value of human continuity, or about the values we hope will be realized in the future, or about the values and norms that should inform our own activities insofar as they affect future generations or depend on the expectation that there will be future generations. Yet we are hardly indifferent to the fate of our successors, and it is not uncommon for issues like climate change that implicate our attitudes toward the future to generate passionate interest and intense controversy. Much of the philosophical literature dealing with future generations focuses on issues of moral responsibility and approaches these issues from a broadly utilitarian perspective, devoting special attention to the puzzles of “population ethics”. In this lecture, I explain why I take a different approach. Rather than focusing exclusively on issues of moral responsibility, I want to consider the broader question of how future generations feature in or are related to our practical and evaluative thought as a whole. My aim is to explore the evaluative commitments that may be latent in our existing attitudes and may help to enrich our thinking about the significance that future generations have for us.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Samuel Scheffler
Keywords
Future generations
beneficence
human continuity
climate change
moral responsibility
population ethics
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 01:00:20

Subscribe

Download

2016 Annual Uehiro Lecture 1: Consequentialism for Cows

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
Professor Shelly Kagan delivers the first of three Annual Uehiro Lectures in Practical Ethics, ‘How to Count Animals, More or Less’
Much contemporary writing on animal ethics is "egalitarian" in the sense that otherwise similar harms (or goods) for people and nonhuman animals are thought to count equally. In this sense, animals and people can be said to have the same moral status ("pain is pain"). In these lectures, however, I will explore an alternative, hierarchical approach, according to which animals differ from people, and from one another, in terms of the moral significance of their lives, their goods and bads, and the various rights that they possess. I'll sketch what a hierarchical approach might look like in a consequentialist framework, and--more complicatedly--in a deontological one, closing with some thoughts about the position of animals in foundational moral theories.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Shelly Kagan
Keywords
philosophy
consequentialism
animal ethics
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 00:56:16

Subscribe

Download

2016 Annual Uehiro Lecture 2: Deontology for Dogs

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
Professor Shelly Kagan delivers the second of three Annual Uehiro Lectures in Practical Ethics, ‘How to Count Animals, More or Less’
Much contemporary writing on animal ethics is "egalitarian" in the sense that otherwise similar harms (or goods) for people and nonhuman animals are thought to count equally. In this sense, animals and people can be said to have the same moral status ("pain is pain"). In these lectures, however, I will explore an alternative, hierarchical approach, according to which animals differ from people, and from one another, in terms of the moral significance of their lives, their goods and bads, and the various rights that they possess. I'll sketch what a hierarchical approach might look like in a consequentialist framework, and--more complicatedly--in a deontological one, closing with some thoughts about the position of animals in foundational moral theories.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Shelly Kagan
Keywords
philosophy
animal ethics
deontology
consequentialism
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 01:00:16

Subscribe

Download

2016 Annual Uehiro Lecture 3: Foundation for Frogs

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
Embed
Professor Shelly Kagan delivers the final of three Annual Uehiro Lectures in Practical Ethics, ‘How to Count Animals, More or Less’
Much contemporary writing on animal ethics is "egalitarian" in the sense that otherwise similar harms (or goods) for people and nonhuman animals are thought to count equally. In this sense, animals and people can be said to have the same moral status ("pain is pain"). In these lectures, however, I will explore an alternative, hierarchical approach, according to which animals differ from people, and from one another, in terms of the moral significance of their lives, their goods and bads, and the various rights that they possess. I'll sketch what a hierarchical approach might look like in a consequentialist framework, and--more complicatedly--in a deontological one, closing with some thoughts about the position of animals in foundational moral theories.

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Lectures: Practical solutions for ethical challenges
People
Shelly Kagan
Keywords
philosophy
animal ethics
consequentialism
deontology
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 06/11/2017
Duration: 00:59:15

Subscribe

Download

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 1818
  • Page 1819
  • Page 1820
  • Page 1821
  • Page 1822
  • Page 1823
  • Page 1824
  • Page 1825
  • Page 1826
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' X Account @oxfordpodcasts | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2026 The University of Oxford