Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

African Knowledge and Livestock Health

Series
TORCH | The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities
Embed
Book at Lunchtime interview with Karen Brown and William Beinart about their book “African Knowledge and Livestock Health”
Part of the "Book at Lunchtime" series at The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (TORCH).
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
TORCH | The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities
People
Karen Brown
William Beinart
Keywords
torch
humanities
research
Department: The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (TORCH)
Date Added: 13/02/2014
Duration: 00:03:33

Subscribe

Download

Collective Agency and Knowledge of Others' Minds

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Stephen Butterfill gives a talk on philosophy and collective agency and other people's minds
When friends walk together, they typically exercise collective agency. By contrast, two strangers walking side by side exercise parallel but merely individual agency. This and other contrasts invite the question, What distinguishes collective agency from parallel but merely individual agency? To answer this question, philosophers standardly appeal to a special kind of intention or structure of intention, knowledge or commitment often called ‘collective intention’. The idea is that exercises of collective agency stand to collective intention much as exercises of ordinary, individual agency stand to ordinary, individual intention. In this talk I shall use this parallel between individual and collective intention to argue that some forms of collective agency are grounded in representations and processes more primitive than those associated with collective intention. Collective agency is not always a matter of what we intend: sometimes it constitutively involves certain structures of motor representation. One consequence is concerns a role for collective agency in explaining knowledge of others’ minds. Reflection on what is involved in sharing a smile suggests that there is a route to knowledge of others’ mental states that is neither straightforwardly perceptual nor inferential but hinges on interaction
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Stephen Butterfill
Keywords
philosophy
psychology
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:57:50

Subscribe

Download

Aristotle on Singular Thought

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Mika Perala gives a talk on Aristotle's philosophy
Aristotle states in the De Memoria et Reminiscentia that we have memories of individuals such as Koriscus. In line with this, he assumes in many contexts (e.g. logical and ethical) that we can make singular propositions on the basis of such perceptual states. However, commentators have been puzzled about whether singular propositions (and thoughts) can be given an adequate account in Aristotle’s psychological theory. The purpose of this paper is to argue that Aristotle’s account of thought admits of two kinds of singular thought: thought about an individual as an instance of a kind (‘This F is G’) and thought simply about an individual ‘a’, without the sortal concept F (‘a is G’). The difference between the two is that whereas the former requires knowledge of the kind (i.e. F) into which the singular item falls, or at least some sortal grasp of the individual in question such as through experience or the testimony of a knowledgeable person, the latter is simply based on, but cannot be identified with, sense perception, memory, phantasy or some other way of gaining non-sortal information about the individual. The view opposed is the Thomistic line of interpretation that, in Aristotle’s view, singular thought is to be understood as some sort of general thought, indirect or reflexive: general thought applied to a singular item given by a phantasm. The Thomistic view makes singular thought merely accidental and fails to give an adequate account of singular truth-claims.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Mika Perala
Keywords
philosophy
aristotle
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:40:55

Subscribe

Download

Multimodal Perception and the Distinction Between the Senses

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Louise Fiona Richardson gives a talk on philosophy and perception
It is beyond dispute that the senses interact. In this paper I will consider the way in which such interaction constrains thought about the senses, and in particular, thought about how they are distinguished from one another. I will consider two views of what it is to have a sense. On the first view, senses are systems. On the second, they are capacities. I will argue that on each view, the occurrence of different forms of multimodal perception rules out some views of how the senses are distinguished. The occurrence of perception not restricted to one sense does not, however, make it impossible to distinguish between the senses, either as systems or capacities. Neither does it make that distinction otiose. And whilst there is an explanatory penalty to be paid if one seeks to explain perception only one sense at a time, I will argue that given a plausible, defensible view of how to count perceptual experiences at a time, interaction between the senses does not show that it is illegitimate to talk of perceptual experiences belonging to one modality, at least whilst thinking of senses as capacities.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Louise Fiona Richardson
Keywords
philosophy
perception
Multimodal Perception
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:46:48

Subscribe

Download

Common Sense and Metaperception

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Jerome Dokic gives a talk on common sense and philosophy
One of the functions of the common sense in Aristotle’s theory of perception is apparently to monitor the activity of our sensory modalities, and to make us aware that we see, hear, touch, taste, etc. However, the status of the common sense as a “second-order” perception, and its relationship to “first-order” perception (seeing, hearing, touching, tasting, etc.) remains to be clarified. On the one hand, numerous examples (involving perceptual certainty and uncertainty, perception of silence, darkness, and more generally absences) show that second order perception cannot be reduced to first-order perception. On the other hand, second-order perception can hardly be conceived as a form of meta-representational awareness, whether perceptual or theory-based. In this presentation, I shall suggest that the monitoring function of the common sense is best understood in relation with contemporary cognitive science research on meta-cognition. Common sense is a meta-perceptual ability which is distinct from both object level sensory perception and meta-representational knowledge about our senses.

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Jerome Dokic
Keywords
philosophy
common sense
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:50:58

Subscribe

Download

The Causal Power of Structure and the Role of Intellect

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Howard Robinson gives a talk on philosophy and the role of the intellect
Abstract: First, I will consider Jaworski’s interesting recent attempt to defend hylomorphism, understood as the irreducible and the causal efficacy of structure. I shall reject this as unsuccessful, then try to see where this leaves us. I shall develop what I’ll dub the ‘radically dualist’ option, according to which the fundamental physical level and the mind are the only fundamental levels. This will involve looking at different interpretations of the question ‘are there any Fs?’ – roughly, the realist and conceptualist interpretations. I shall then look at how this relates to the Aristotelian/Wigginsian treatment of our common-sense ontology, especially the reality of biological entities
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Howard Robinson
Keywords
philosophy
aristotle
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:44:12

Subscribe

Download

Aristotle on the Problem of Common Sensibles

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
Embed
Anna Marmodoro gives a talk on Aristotle and his philosophy
Aristotle draws a distinction between qualities that are perceptible via a single sense only, the special sensibles, and qualities that are perceptible by more than one sense at once, the common sensibles. What are the ontology and the epistemology of the common sensibles, in light of Aristotle’s assumption that each sense organ is sensitive to only its own special sensibles? Does the problem of common sensibles give us reasons for giving up a ‘separatist’ view of sense experiences? Or rather can it be solved by postulating extra perceptual powers for the senses? Are more ‘parsimonious’ options viable? In this paper I engage with these and related questions, which have attracted the interest of Aristotelian scholars (Gregoric 2007, Johansen 2012) and philosophers of the mind (Tye 2007) alike. I offer my own reading of Aristotle’s account and examine its philosophical viability.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies
People
Anna Marmodoro
Keywords
philosophy
aristotle
power structuralism
ontologies
Department: Faculty of Philosophy
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:51:53

Subscribe

Download

"Emerging Markets" on the Internet

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
Embed
Vili Lehdonvirta discusses emerging markets on the Internet.

Episode Information

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
People
Vili Lehdonvirta
Keywords
internet
economics
virtual economy
Department: Oxford Internet Institute
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:19:33

Subscribe

Download

How Do People Interact with Virtual Environments?

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
Embed
Andrew Przybylski discusses the motivational dynamics of how people approach ICTs, social media and video games.

Episode Information

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
People
Andrew Przybylski
Keywords
internet
motivation
psychology
video games
social media
behaviour
Department: Oxford Internet Institute
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:16:39

Subscribe

Download

Learning, Education and the Internet

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
Embed
Rebecca Eynon summarises key areas of her research on learning, education, and the Internet.

Episode Information

Series
Oxford Internet Institute - Lectures and Seminars
People
Rebecca Eynon
Keywords
internet
education
learning
Department: Oxford Internet Institute
Date Added: 12/02/2014
Duration: 00:17:52

Subscribe

Download

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 2283
  • Page 2284
  • Page 2285
  • Page 2286
  • Page 2287
  • Page 2288
  • Page 2289
  • Page 2290
  • Page 2291
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' X Account @oxfordpodcasts | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2026 The University of Oxford