Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

OxPeace 2022 Session 2: Part 3

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
Embed
Professor Brandon Hamber presents "Tripping, falling, yapping: How the Northern Ireland peace process never reached its potential?"
The paper takes its title from a well-known Seamus Heaney poem, Follower. In the poem, the narrator relates how his father expertly ploughs a field while his son (presumably Heaney) makes a nuisance of himself "tripping, falling and yapping" while following his father. The poem ends with Heaney relating how the cycle repeats, and now the father stumbles behind his son, holding him back. This paper argues that despite many achievements, most notably a dramatic decrease in political deaths, the cycle of a stumbling peace process continues 25 years later. The ongoing cycle of division with all the hallmarks of the "tripping, falling, yapping" of the past remains. This is the result of multiple factors. These include the separation of institution-building from people-to-people peacebuilding, and the failure to change underlying social divisions and narratives. This has left the process continually underachieving and unprepared for social and political changes such as Brexit. The lessons from Northern Ireland, and what this means for the future and other peace processes, are discussed.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
People
Brandon Hamber
Keywords
peace
northern ireland
Brexit
peacebuilding
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 10/06/2022
Duration: 00:16:54

Subscribe

Download

OxPeace 2022 Session 2: Part 2

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
Embed
Andrei Gomez-Suarez presents "Multilevel Infrastructures for Peace: The Case of Colombia."
The 2016 Colombian peace agreement ended a fifty-two-year war with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). According to the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, it is the most comprehensive peace agreement to date. It established national, regional and local infrastructures to formulate development plans in Colombia's sixteen most conflict-affected regions, a coca crop substitution programme, political reform measures to ensure the political participation of marginalised sectors of society, the political, economic and social reintegration of former FARC combatants with security guarantees, and the satisfaction of victims' rights to truth, justice, reparations and non-recurrence. It also created international peace infrastructures to aid implementation, monitor progress, and offer recommendations. These multilevel infrastructures for peace have been fundamental for building sustainable peace, despite the rocky implementation of the peace agreement after the arrival of a new government bent on reforming it 2018. In this talk I outline six infrastructures (Rural Development Plans, Coca Crop Substitution Programme, the National Reincorporation Council, the Truth Commission, the Peace Tribunal, and the UN Mission to Colombia) which, amid rising violence, have so far halted the return of full-scale war.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
People
Andrei Gomez-Suarez
Keywords
colombia
peace
peacebuilding
infrastructures
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 10/06/2022
Duration: 00:18:17

Subscribe

Download

OxPeace 2022 Session 2: Part 1

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
Embed
Dr Liz Carmichael presents "Implementing peace: South Africa’s Peace Structures 1991-1994."
When apartheid crumbled at the close of the 1980s, two major conflicts were gripping South Africa: that between the white minority government (with its security forces, police and army) and the majority population, and the low-intensity civil war which pitted Zulus loyal to the conservative Inkatha movement against ANC supporters in Natal and KwaZulu. With Mandela’s release and the unbanning of the liberation movements in February 1990 it was expected that two things would follow: the start of multi-party talks to devise a new non-racial constitution, and the cessation of the ANC-Inkatha war. Neither happened. Instead the ANC- Inkatha war spread to the industrial townships around Johannesburg, A crisis point in 1991 led to the negotiation of the National Peace Accord, facilitated by civil society (church and business leaders). To implement itself, the NPA set up a complete infrastructure for peace involving political organizations, civil society and the security forces, at national, regional and local levels. The country was divided into 11 regions, which formed over 260 local Peace Committees. Activities included conflict resolution, training, ‘marketing’ peace, peace monitoring to implement the NPA’s Codes of Conduct for political organizations and security forces, and socio-economic reconstruction and development. The peaceful election in April 1994 was in no small part due to the structures and their 18,500 peace monitors. Although many felt there was more peacebuilding to be done, the structures were dismantled at the end of 1994, except for maintaining a minimal provincial presence in KwaZulu-Natal until 2001. The NPA structures, which were entirely home-grown, remain the most comprehensive example of such an ‘Infrastructure for peace’ (I4P).
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
People
Liz Carmichael
Keywords
peace
south africa
apartheid
peacebuilding
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 10/06/2022
Duration: 00:23:20

Subscribe

Download

OxPeace 2022 Session 1

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
Embed
Opening plenary and keynote addresses.
Chair: Professor Richard Caplan, Associate Professor of International Relations, Oxford

Professor John Paul Lederach presents:

"The patient stitching of impermanent peace: Four evolutions along the personal journey"

Across four decades, experience suggests that peace has remained elusive while the questions of who builds peace and how coordination among initiatives and actors in dynamic situations coheres has remained a constant challenge. Through personal reflection on practice and inductive theory-building, four emergent evolutions of thought will be explored around this reality of impermanence with its significant paradoxes, dilemmas, gaps, and what seems to constitute essential tenets of peacebuilding.

Dr Thania Paffenholz presents:

"Rethinking peacebuilding in a world out of order"

The war in Ukraine is starkly illustrating that existing systems to build peace are out of order. Should they be adapted, or do we need a wholesale rethink of the notion of peacebuilding? I argue that we should radically reconsider fundamental concepts of peacebuilding like peace processes, tracks, and the binary notions of success and failure and of negative and positive peace in order to reach a reality-based understanding of peacebuilding as the recurrent renegotiation of the social and political contract of societies, policies, and states towards pathways to peace. We thereby need to embrace the reality of messiness, progress, and backlash, and never lose sight of our creativity and will to change what we can change. I will demonstrate this from my personal perspective as a researcher and practitioner with different examples including Ukraine.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
People
Richard Caplan
John Paul Lederach
Thania Paffenholz
Keywords
peace
opening
peacebuilding
Department: Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR)
Date Added: 10/06/2022
Duration: 01:19:17

Subscribe

Download

OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?

Image
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace?
OxPeace Conference 2022: Who Builds Peace? The Relationships between International, National, Regional, and Local Levels in Peacebuilding. The fourteenth annual OxPeace day conference.

Subscribe

Navigating non-market forces in a nascent entrepreneurship ecosystem

Series
Future of Business
Embed
Rudolph Okai talks to Ashraf Mizo about his entrepreneurship experience and what the company (Nayla) he founded is doing.
Join us on this episode of Future of Business to listen to Ashraf take us through his entrepreneurship journey in Sudan from making prosthesis to supporting SME’s with funding, while dealing with nonmarket issues. Nayla seeks to establish disability inclusion and economic empowerment in Sudan.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Future of Business
People
Ashraf Mizo
Rudolph Okai
Keywords
human-machine
gesture control
prosthesis
disability
funding
small business
government
Department: Saïd Business School
Date Added: 10/06/2022
Duration:

Subscribe

Download

Eli Upfal

No podcasts episodes were found for this contributor.

A Theory of Weak-Supervision and Zero-Shot Learning

Series
Department of Statistics
Embed
A lecture exploring alternatives to using labeled training data.
Labeled training data is often scarce, unavailable, or can be very costly to obtain. To circumvent this problem, there is a growing interest in developing methods that can exploit sources of information other than labeled data, such as weak-supervision and zero-shot learning. While these techniques obtained impressive accuracy in practice, both for vision and language domains, they come with no theoretical characterization of their accuracy. In a sequence of recent works, we develop a rigorous mathematical framework for constructing and analyzing algorithms that combine multiple sources of related data to solve a new learning task. Our learning algorithms provably converge to models that have minimum empirical risk with respect to an adversarial choice over feasible labelings for a set of unlabeled data, where the feasibility of a labeling is computed through constraints defined by estimated statistics of the sources. Notably, these methods do not require the related sources to have the same labeling space as the multiclass classification task. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with experimentations on various image classification tasks.
Creative Commons Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK (BY-NC-SA): England & Wales; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Department of Statistics
People
Eli Upfal
Keywords
data
algorithms
analysis
zero shot learning
Department: Department of Statistics
Date Added: 09/06/2022
Duration: 01:03:33

Subscribe

Download

Power to the Ppl

Series
Proving the Negative (PTNPod): Swanning About in Cyber Security
Embed
Data protection and making consent more of a conversation. Listen up, and prosper!
This week we're talking about Ari's research into why experts need to build (or architect) systems with better consent options, so users have more of a choice about the data they share.

Ari's academic work relates to data protection. She argues that the burden of communication (i.e. of informing) falls on experts to communicate clearly and concisely instead of on users to understand dense technical language. Ari has collaborated with Computer Scientists, Lawyers and Medical researchers. She also educates in and out of the classroom; running classes and workshops, and cyber-policy competitions, crisis simulations and hackathons. Outside of this, Ari has led cyber security work within UK innovation testbeds, focusing on secure and trustworthy information exchange for next-generation telecommunications. Her ethos is that cyber security is strategic, it is a business enabler, and the best cyber security cultures are positive and pro-active.

You can find Ari on Twitter: @schulite
If you want to read more about Royal Free and Google: https://medconfidential.org/whats-the-story/health-data-ai-and-google-deepmind

Recent outputs: What societal values will 6G address? (6G-IA working group: https://6g-ia.eu/single_post/?slug=6g-ia-white-paper-what-societal-values-will-6g-address-societal-key-values-and-key-value-indicators-analysed-through-6g-use-cases); Tabitha L. James, Jennifer L. Ziegelmayer, Arianna Schuler Scott and Grace Fox (2021). A Multiple-Motive Heuristic-Systematic Model for Examining How Users Process Android Data and Service Access Notifications, doi: 10.1145/3447934.3447941; Arianna Schuler Scott, Michael Goldsmith & Harriet Teare (2019). Wider Research Applications of Dynamic Consent, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-16744-8_8

Episode Information

Series
Proving the Negative (PTNPod): Swanning About in Cyber Security
People
Arianna Schuler Scott
Claudine Tinsman
Keywords
cyber security
Data Protection
privacy
informed consent
engagement
security
proving the negative
ptnpod
Department: Cyber Security Centre
Date Added: 09/06/2022
Duration: 00:20:09

Subscribe

Download

Robert Mayer

No podcasts episodes were found for this contributor.

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 230
  • Page 231
  • Page 232
  • Page 233
  • Page 234
  • Page 235
  • Page 236
  • Page 237
  • Page 238
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' X Account @oxfordpodcasts | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2026 The University of Oxford